The term modernization “does not denote any philosophy or movement, but it only
symbolises a process of change. In fact, “Modernisation” is understood as a process which
indicates the adoption of the modern ways of life and values”. The term was being used previously
to refer only "to change in economy and its related effect on social values and practices". It was
also described as a process that changed the society, from primarily agricultural to primarily
industrial economy. As a result of the change in the economy, the society itself underwent changes
in values, beliefs and norms. But, today the term is given a broader meaning.
Today, the term, ‘Modernisation’ is understood as an attempt, on the part of the people,
particularly those who are custom-bound, to adopt themselves to the present time, conditions,
styles, and ways in general. It indicates a change in people's food habits, dress habits, speaking
styles, tastes, choices, preferences, ideas, values, recreational facilities and so on. It is alsb
described as “social change involving the elements of science and technology”.
The scientific and
technological inventions have brought about remarkable changes in the whole system of social
relationship and installed new ideologies in the place of traditional ones.
M.N. Srinivas, however, criticises the concept of Modernisation, according to him, it is a
value-loaded term. He says that “Modernisation is normally used in the sense that it is good. He,
therefore, prefer to use the term ‘Westernisation’ which characterises the changes brought about in
Indian society and culture as a result of over 150 years of British rule”.
Yogendra Singh, on the other hand, defends the concept of modernisation. According to
him, it is broader than the two processes of Sanskritisation and Westernisation. It is, indeed a
'cultural universal' and not necessarily confined to any single society.
Like science, modernity is
not an exclusive possession of any one ethnic or cultural group. It belongs to the humanity as a
whole. This does not mean that everywhere it should reveal the same pattern. It need not always
take place on the model of England, Germany, France or America. It can take place on the model
of Russia, India, Japan, Australia, or any other country for that matter. What is essential to
modernisation is this - a commitment to “scientific world view” and a belief in the humanistic and
philosophical viewpoint of science on contemprorary problems.
As it has already been mentioned, the process of modernisation has different dimensions.
The spirit of modernisation is expressed in different areas such as - social organisation, culture,
political field, economy, education, etc., in different ways. Broadly speaking, the process of
modernization reveals the following important characteristics:
Modernisation includes – “a temple of science, reason and rationalism, secularism, high
aspiration and achievement orientation, overall transformation of attitudes norms and values,
creation of new functional institutions, investment In human resources, a growth oriented
economy, a national interest rather than kin, caste, religion, region or language oriented interests,
an open society, and a mobile person” - (Ram Ahuja in his “Indian Social System”).
According to B. Kuppuswamy, “the main feature of Modernisation is the building up of an
‘open society’ in which individuals of talent, enterprise and training can find places in the society
appropriate to their achievement... The process of Modernisation involves an increase in social
unrest till the social system is responsive to the new aspirations built up by the Modernisation
process”. It should, however, be noted that the same process of modernisation institutes
appropriate change in the social system to meet the rising expectations of the people.
No comments:
Post a Comment